If you do not have the requisite authority, you may not accept the License Agreement or use the SDK on behalf of your employer or other entity.ģ.1 Subject to the terms of the License Agreement, Google grants you a limited, worldwide, royalty-free, non-assignable, non-exclusive, and non-sublicensable license to use the SDK solely to develop applications for compatible implementations of Android.ģ.2 You may not use this SDK to develop applications for other platforms (including non-compatible implementations of Android) or to develop another SDK. You may not use the SDK if you do not accept the License Agreement.Ģ.2 By clicking to accept and/or using this SDK, you hereby agree to the terms of the License Agreement.Ģ.3 You may not use the SDK and may not accept the License Agreement if you are a person barred from receiving the SDK under the laws of the United States or other countries, including the country in which you are resident or from which you use the SDK.Ģ.4 If you are agreeing to be bound by the License Agreement on behalf of your employer or other entity, you represent and warrant that you have full legal authority to bind your employer or such entity to the License Agreement. The License Agreement forms a legally binding contract between you and Google in relation to your use of the SDK.ġ.2 "Android" means the Android software stack for devices, as made available under the Android Open Source Project, which is located at the following URL:, as updated from time to time.ġ.3 A "compatible implementation" means any Android device that (i) complies with the Android Compatibility Definition document, which can be found at the Android compatibility website () and which may be updated from time to time and (ii) successfully passes the Android Compatibility Test Suite (CTS).ġ.4 "Google" means Google LLC, organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, USA, and operating under the laws of the USA with principal place of business at 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, CA 94043, USA.Ģ.1 In order to use the SDK, you must first agree to the License Agreement. tasks.This is the Android Software Development Kit License Agreementġ.1 The Android Software Development Kit (referred to in the License Agreement as the "SDK" and specifically including the Android system files, packaged APIs, and Google APIs add-ons) is licensed to you subject to the terms of the License Agreement. But I currently don’t know about the influence at development time, like the settings done in Eclipse. In theory, with JDK 11 those could be easier set using the newly introduced release-option. The important thing in my setup is that I want to keep targeting JDK 8, that’s while the dependency is compileOnly and why my compatibility-options still look like the following: java So, when build with JDK 11, additional dependencies are simply made available and compiling succeeds again. This can then be applied to adle using the following line: apply from: 'buildSrc/src/main/java/adle' To do so, I decided to create a new Gradle-file documenting that problem with the following code: if (JavaVersion.current().isJava8())ĬompileOnly 'javax.annotation:javax.annotation-api:1.3.2' What does seem to work as well is configuring the directory where JDK 8 is placed in the Gradle-configs of Eclipse:īut to make the build succeed using JDK 11, the missing packages need to be made available as additional dependency. Only Eclipse knows about JDK 11 and I configured the path to use it in eclipse.ini. When publishing the projects on the shell things succeed again, because JDK 8 is still the default JDK of the system. TargetCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8 SourceCompatibility = JavaVersion.VERSION_1_8 My adle already contained the following two statements, which don’t seem to have any effect: sourceCompatibility = 1.8Ĭhanging those lines to the following didn’t change anything as well: java The problem is with Buildship: When using the Gradle’s task view to publish some projects, compilation fails with errors which are clearly related to using JDK 11 as well:Ĭ:\Users\jooq\Sequences.java:7: error: package javax.annotation does not exist Coding in Eclipse itself seems to work as expected, especially I don’t get any errors or warnings about deprecations or missing classes because of changes JDK 8 vs. Besides that, I have still registered JDK 8 as default JRE to be used by Eclipse. Reasons are that I need the C+±plugin CDT, which seems to only work with JDK 11, and Eclipse requires JDK 11 for itself with the next release anyway. Until Eclipse 2020-03 I executed it with JDK 8, since Eclipse 2020-06 I’m doing so with JDK 11.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |